We still don't have a more precise value for "Big G"

· science · Source ↗

TLDR

  • NIST spent a decade replicating a divergent 2007 BIPM torsion balance experiment, yielding 6.67387e-11 m³/kg/s² – 0.0235% below BIPM’s original result, without resolving the discrepancy.

Key Takeaways

  • Paper in Metrologia reports a decade-long NIST effort to replicate the 2007 BIPM torsion balance result, one of the largest outliers in Big G measurements.
  • The discrepancy across all modern Big G measurements is roughly 1 part in 10,000 – large relative to other fundamental constants, which are known far more precisely.
  • NIST used two mass materials (copper and sapphire) and two independent measurement methods (gravitational torque and electrostatic compensation), ruling out material-dependent artifacts.
  • Gravity’s extreme weakness relative to other fundamental forces makes lab measurement noisy; Earth’s own gravitational field dominates as background noise.
  • Physicists argue continued precision efforts produce better instruments for measuring small forces and torques, with broad scientific benefit beyond the G value itself.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • No substantive HN discussion yet.

Original | Discuss on HN