The predictable failure of the QDay Prize

· Source ↗

TLDR

  • The QDay Prize awarded 1 BTC for breaking a 15-bit ECC key via Shor’s algorithm, but the winning submission works identically with random number substitution.

Key Takeaways

  • Current quantum computers have ~1 error per 1,000 gates; cryptographic Shor’s algorithm requires billions of gates, and error correction is the unbridged gap.
  • For small problems, Shor’s algorithm succeeds by accident regardless of QC quality, so competition results reflect luck, not quantum progress.
  • GitHub user @yuvadm (Yuval Adam) confirmed: swapping the winning submission’s quantum calls for random calls produces indistinguishable results.
  • The winning circuit (ELDPC from Roetteler et al. 2017, Draper-style phase adders) is technically correct but contributes nothing a 1996 machine could not have produced.
  • Project11’s “512x jump” framing against a prior equally flawed demo compounds the credibility damage and hands critics a ready-made post-quantum transition gotcha.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • No substantive HN discussion yet.

Original | Discuss on HN