Follow-up to Carrot disclosure: Forgejo

· security · Source ↗

TLDR

  • After publishing a carrot disclosure on Forgejo, jvoisin faced social pressure, Mastodon removals, and community backlash before ultimately sending exploits and recommendations to security@forgejo.org.

Key Takeaways

  • Forgejo’s security team scope is explicitly reactive: handling reports sent to security@forgejo.org; proactive vulnerability work is outside their mandate.
  • Toot linking to the original post was removed from infosec.exchange and mastodon.social before being restored, illustrating Mastodon moderation inconsistency on disclosure debates.
  • Netherlands deployed a sovereign software forge on a public Forgejo instance, raising the stakes for Forgejo’s security posture.
  • jvoisin ultimately sent an apology, reasoning, hardening recommendations, and commented proof-of-concepts to the Forgejo security team.
  • Exploit-writer peers warned the disclosure brought unwanted attention to what they consider an easy target.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • No substantive HN discussion yet.

Original | Discuss on HN