Stop big tech from making users behave in ways they don't want to

· media · Source ↗

TLDR

  • LA jury found Meta and YouTube liable for addictive product design; a 2019 confidential Meta slide deck concluded teens can’t switch off Instagram even when they want to.

Key Takeaways

  • March 25 LA jury ruling found Meta and YouTube liable for deliberately engineering addictive products targeting the brain’s reward system.
  • Internal Meta slide from 2019 explicitly stated: “Teens can’t switch off from Instagram even if they want to.”
  • Separate internal memo showed 12-year-olds were 3x more likely than 32-year-olds to stay on Facebook long-term; memo recommended investing in recruiting more tweens despite a 13+ age policy.
  • The article frames the legal and regulatory challenge as targeting reward-system engineering specifically, not just dark patterns.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • Commenters debated whether addictive design and dark patterns are the same thing; one argued addictive apps differ because users often do want to use them, making manipulation framing weaker for adults.
  • The tween-targeting memo drew the sharpest reaction, with commenters drawing explicit parallels to tobacco industry tactics and long-term reputational damage for engineers involved.

Notable Comments

  • @2OEH8eoCRo0: Facebook memo recommended “investing more heavily in bringing in larger volumes of tweens” despite a 13+ age rule.
  • @ViktorRay: “descendants of the engineers who work at Big Tech will be looked upon” the way tobacco-industry workers are now.

Original | Discuss on HN