sRGB profile comparison

· ai-agents · Source ↗

TLDR

  • A 2012/2015 audit of 15 sRGB ICC profiles found that only Cinepaint and RawStudio matched exactly; every other tool ships a subtly different sRGB.

Key Takeaways

  • XYZ primaries cluster into 5 groups; practical color differences are only visible in saturated cyans and greens, and only at extreme saturation.
  • The “mystery profile” lacks Bradford D50 adaptation entirely, producing a visible blue cast – a real-world failure mode to watch for in raw pipelines.
  • D50 vs D65 white point in the profile header is harmless in relative colorimetric conversions but causes color casts under absolute colorimetric intent.
  • Tone Response Curves vary: most use sRGB-1024 LUT, dcraw uses gamma=1.933594, Scarse uses gamma=2.199219, RawTherapee uses sRGB-4096 – affecting shadow/highlight rendering.
  • Software versions matter: by 2015, Krita and darktable had already switched profiles, so any audit is a point-in-time snapshot.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • No substantive HN discussion yet.

Original | Discuss on HN