Nonprofit hospitals spend billions on management consultants with no clear effect

· ai · Source ↗

TLDR

  • JAMA study finds nonprofit hospitals spent $7.8B on management consulting over 2010-2022 with no statistically significant improvements in finances, staffing, operations, or patient outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • Researchers used IRS Form 990 filings and machine learning to identify consulting contracts, comparing 306 hospitals that hired consultants against matched controls.
  • No meaningful changes found across net patient revenue, operating margin, days of cash on hand, readmission rates, or mortality; only a small uptick in stroke readmissions.
  • Over 20% of nonprofit hospitals engaged management consultants during the study period; average spend was $15.7M per hospital.
  • When HR and IT consultants are included, total nonprofit hospital consulting spend exceeds $25B over the same period.
  • Authors call for greater transparency in how tax-subsidized nonprofit hospitals allocate consulting dollars, and more research before drawing causal conclusions.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • Commenters split on the “blame-shifting” theory: one argued consulting spend lets hospital bureaucrats deflect accountability for unpopular decisions, but another pushed back that these management consultants are not advising on high-level strategic calls.
  • Thin discussion overall; no technical methodological critique of the JAMA study’s matched-control design or IRS 990 data limitations surfaced.

Notable Comments

  • @boznz: argues consulting spend functions as political cover, letting administrators distance themselves from unpopular policies.

Original | Discuss on HN