Looking at the data behind prediction markets

· ai · Source ↗

Dan Schwarz audits Polymarket and Kalshi against five promised benefits of prediction markets, finding volume concentrated in gambling rather than useful societal foresight.

What Matters

  • 90% of Kalshi’s trading volume is sports betting; 80%+ of Polymarket volume is sports, crypto, or elections.
  • Risk monitoring is the one category with supply-demand balance: 2,821 markets, $3.8B volume, 199 daily/weekly conflict trackers.
  • Markets detect risks only after stories are already large—useful for monitoring, not discovery.
  • Health markets failed: Kalshi’s weekly COVID vaccine markets averaged $8,000 each and missed Omicron at 3% odds one week before resolution.
  • 85% of “interpreting news” volume ($1.25B total) is US federal interest rate markets—terrain CME futures and Bloomberg already cover.
  • Accountability markets: two-thirds of $173M volume is Epstein file speculation, diagnosed by Rohanifar et al. (2026) as “prediction laundering.”
  • AI markets ($25M volume) use Arena voting scores as judge—not credible by expert standards, serving bettors not decision-makers.

Original | Discuss on HN