You don't need advice from editors on rejected manuscripts
https://twitter.com/orsonscottcard/status/2046702294406680751Article
TL;DR
Feedback names the problem accurately; the suggested fix is usually wrong — use the signal, not the prescription.
Key Takeaways
- Card took ‘too long’ feedback, found the real structural issue, won a Hugo — the fix wasn’t shortening it
- Users identify problems reliably; their proposed solutions are unreliable — separate the two
- Applies directly to product: ‘it’s complicated’ is true, the user’s suggested simplification may not be
Discussion
Top comments:
- [trjordan]: Users are right about the problem, wrong about the fix — always separate these
-
[mwigdahl]: Zvi’s rule: listen to what’s wrong, ignore how to fix it
If someone tells you what’s wrong, listen to them. If they tell you how to fix it, ignore them.
- [Silamoth]: Same in game dev: players nail the symptom, prescribe broken solutions constantly
| Type | Link |
| Added | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Modified | Apr 23, 2026 |
| comments | 57 |
| hn_id | 47860682 |
| score | 95 |
| target_url | https://twitter.com/orsonscottcard/status/2046702294406680751 |