https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/xmvjyjekkpr/Rakoff%20-%20order%20-%20AI.pdf
Article
-
Federal court rules AI chat logs (specifically Claude) are not covered by attorney-client privilege
-
Prosecution successfully argued Heppner’s Claude chats were accessible because no attorney was directly involved
-
Voluntarily sharing info with a third-party AI breaks privilege, per the ruling
-
Sets a significant precedent for AI tool use in legal contexts
Discussion
-
Commenters argue self-hosted models should remain privileged since no third party receives the data
-
Inconsistency flagged: Google Docs research or library notes would be covered, but AI chats aren’t
-
Seen as a temporary ruling — likely to be revisited as AI becomes standard legal tooling
-
Interesting analogy: using Gemini sidebar in Google Docs to clean up a privileged message — is that covered?
Discuss on HN