Scoring Show HN submissions for AI design patterns
https://www.adriankrebs.ch/blog/design-slop/Article
TL;DR
21% of Show HN submissions show 5+ AI-generated design patterns; dang wants the raw data.
Key Takeaways
- Heavy slop: 105 sites (21%), mild: 230 (46%), clean: 165 (33%) across ~500 Show HN submissions
- Each major AI model (Opus, GPT, Gemini) has distinct, detectable visual fingerprints
- Most flagged patterns — gradients, purple accents, rounded rects — predate AI; blame shadcn/TailwindUI
Discussion
Top comments:
- [simonw]: Side projects are ideal for AI tools; time-constrained work naturally uses available shortcuts
- [deaux]: Each model has its own visual archetype; mixing them into one score loses signal
- [dang]: Wants IDs for all 3 categories to build browsable HN URLs from the data
- [nomdep]: Flagged design patterns were common before AI — this conflates trends with AI output
| Type | Link |
| Added | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Modified | Apr 22, 2026 |
| comments | 159 |
| hn_id | 47864393 |
| score | 215 |
| target_url | https://www.adriankrebs.ch/blog/design-slop/ |