Preserving the Freedom to Learn in AI
https://a16z.com/preserving-the-freedom-to-learn-in-ai/-
Lawful access to info = lawful right to learn from it — human or machine.
- Scale of automation doesn’t change legality vs. manual copying.
- Courts already rejected publisher overrides on first-sale doctrine.
- Three threats: publisher AI bans, training copyright suits, inference control.
-
Restrictive licensing crushes startups; only incumbents can afford deals.
- “Little Tech” locked out while Big Tech negotiates its way in.
- robots.txt model — voluntary, machine-readable — should replace legal mandates.
- Contracts that negate copyright’s public protections should be unenforceable.
-
Five policy asks: affirm learning rights, ban infringing outputs, Open Data Commons.
- Getty/Perplexity and Time/OpenAI show licensing works for non-public data.
Matt Perault (a16z Head of AI Policy) · 2026-02-11 · Read on a16z.com
| Type | Link |
| Added | Feb 11, 2026 |
| Modified | Apr 15, 2026 |